The High Court has settled a dispute between three brothers (Richard, Adrian and Philip) over the inheritance of the family farm.

The court heard that the brothers had all worked on the farm for most of their lives having been given assurances by their father, Albert, and mother, Brenda, that they would inherit equal shares.

Richard and Adrian said their parents had reiterated these assurances several times over many years and told them they were ‘working for their futures’.

When Brenda died, each son inherited 26.66% with Albert retaining the other 20%.

However, when Albert died in 2015, he left his 20% to Philip, bringing his share of the business to 46.66%.

Richard and Adrian challenged the will, saying they had worked on the farm for only modest remuneration and had only done so because they thought they would all inherit equally. They said the effect of the will was that they had suffered a detriment unfairly.

The court found in their favour.

It accepted that they had stayed with the business for most of their working lives on the basis of the assurances given by their parents. In doing so, they had forfeited the chance to pursue a different career.

They had therefore established that they had suffered a detriment by relying on those assurances, a legal concept called “proprietary estoppel”

Inheritance disputes can tear families apart. Our experienced probate team offers clear, compassionate legal guidance to help you resolve matters fairly. Contact us today for expert support.

Disclaimer: General Information Provided Only.

Please note that the contents of this article are intended solely for general information purposes and should not be considered as legal advice.

    Request a callback

    One of our highly experienced team will be in touch with you shortly.